Descriptors for the sites of the schooldata
dataset, from Charnes et al. (1981).
The study was designed to compare schools using Program Follow Through (PFT)
management methods of taking actions to achieve goals with those of
Non Follow Through (NFT). Observations 1:49
came from PFT sites
and 50:70
from NFT sites.
This dataset gives other descriptors for the sites, from their Exhibit C.
Usage
data("schoolsites")
Format
A data frame with 70 observations on the following 7 variables.
site
site number, a numeric vector
type
program type, a factor with levels
PFT
("Program Follow Through") andNFT
("Non Follow Through")model
education style model, a factor with levels
BA
,Bank Street
,California Process
,Cognitive Curriculum
,DIM
,EDC
,Home-School
,ILM
,Parent Education
,Responsive Education
,SEDL
,TEEM
site_name
location of site, a character vector
region
US region, a factor with levels
NC
,NE
,S
,W
city_size
city size, an ordered factor with levels
Rural
<Small
<Medium
<Large
student_pop
size of the student population, a numeric vector
Source
A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1981). Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through. Management Science, 27, 668-697, Exhibit C.
Examples
data(schoolsites)
str(schoolsites)
#> 'data.frame': 70 obs. of 7 variables:
#> $ site : int 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
#> $ type : Factor w/ 2 levels "PFT","NFT": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
#> $ model : Factor w/ 12 levels "BA","Bank Street",..: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 12 12 12 ...
#> $ site_name : chr "Berkeley, CA" "Buffalo, NY" "Duluth, MN" "Fresno, CA" ...
#> $ region : Factor w/ 4 levels "NC","NE","S",..: 4 2 1 4 2 4 4 3 2 1 ...
#> $ city_size : Ord.factor w/ 4 levels "Rural"<"Small"<..: 3 4 3 3 1 3 3 4 2 3 ...
#> $ student_pop: int 99 77 77 48 14 36 51 99 80 96 ...
schools <- cbind(schooldata, schoolsites)
schools.mod <- lm(cbind(reading, mathematics, selfesteem) ~
education + occupation + visit + counseling + teacher +
type + region, data = schools)
car::Anova(schools.mod)
#>
#> Type II MANOVA Tests: Pillai test statistic
#> Df test stat approx F num Df den Df Pr(>F)
#> education 1 0.37965 11.8320 3 58 3.773e-06 ***
#> occupation 1 0.53605 22.3376 3 58 9.720e-10 ***
#> visit 1 0.26933 7.1264 3 58 0.0003721 ***
#> counseling 1 0.07204 1.5008 3 58 0.2238866
#> teacher 1 0.01106 0.2163 3 58 0.8847243
#> type 1 0.10345 2.2307 3 58 0.0942228 .
#> region 3 0.26764 1.9591 9 180 0.0465145 *
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1